On this page:
1 Symmetry modulo BRST-exact expression
2 Enters
3 Particular cases
3.1 Standard BRST, standard polarization, off-shell symmetry
3.2 Bosonic string, being diffeomorphisms
3.3 RNS
3.4 Pure spinor string

Expansion in antifields

On this page we will investigate the structure of from the point of view of the antifield expansion. Suppose that we have the solution of the Master Equation in the form of the series in the antifields:

    1 Symmetry modulo BRST-exact expression

    2 Enters

    3 Particular cases

      3.1 Standard BRST, standard polarization, off-shell symmetry

      3.2 Bosonic string, being diffeomorphisms

      3.3 RNS

      3.4 Pure spinor string

1 Symmetry modulo BRST-exact expression

Suppose that the leading term is invariant under some Lie algebra of infinitesimal transformations, parametrized by :

(41)

Moreover, we assume:

Eq. (41) implies:

This defines the cohomology class:

(42)

Let us assume that we can construct the full expansion for a ghost number object:

(43)

The class (42) is an obstacle to choosing in such a way that:

2 Enters

For our applications, we need a special case when is BRST-exact:

Moreover, there is a special case when the expansion of starts at the linear order in antifields:

In this case is zero on-shell.

Generally speaking, the expansion of starts with the term constant in antifields. In this case, all we can say about is:

exists ⇒ on-shell is of something

3 Particular cases

3.1 Standard BRST, standard polarization, off-shell symmetry

Apriori may be unrelated to the gauge group. However, if is the gauge group, then we have:

see Eq. (40).

3.2 Bosonic string, being diffeomorphisms

Notice that the term (constant in the antifields) is the effect of rotated (with respect to standard) polarization. (In the standard approach would be counted as an antifield.) Moreover, we have:

where .

3.3 RNS

TODO, but conjectured to be of the same type as bosonic.

3.4 Pure spinor string

TODO:
  • still , althought the expression for is rather complicated

  • the expansion (43) probably does not terminate on the term linear in the antifields

  • the possible obstacle (42) is potentially non-zero and should be computed