Introduction
BV formalism is a generalization of the BRST formalism, based on the mathematical theory of odd symplectic supermanifolds. In this formalism the path integral is interpreted as an integral of a density of weight over a Lagrangian submanifold. It turns out that this “standard” formulation is not sufficient to describe string worldsheet theory. One has to also consider integration over families of Lagrangian submanifolds. Indeed, the idea of Schwarz:2000ct,Mikhailov:2016myt,Mikhailov:2016rkp was to interpret integration over the worldsheet metrics as a particular case of integration over the space of gauge fixing conditions. Varying the worldsheet metric is a particular case of varying the Lagrangian submanifold. Taking into account the worldsheet diffeomorphism invariance requires an equivariant version of this integration procedure. (In a sense, worldsheet metric is not necessarily a preferred, or “special”, object. Varying the worldsheet metric is just one way to build an integration cycle, there are others. The worldsheet diffeomorphisms, however, are special.)
The construction of equivariant form involves a map of some differential graded Lie algebra (DGLA) into the algebra of functions on the BV phase space of the string sigma-model. To the best of our knowledge, was first introduced, or at least clearly presented, in Alekseev:2010gr. Here we will rederive some constructions of Mikhailov:2016myt,Mikhailov:2016rkp using an algebraic language which emphasizes the DGLA structure, and apply some results of Alekseev:2010gr to the study of worldsheet vertex operators. In a sense, is a “universal structure” in equivariant BV formalism, i.e. the “worst-case scenario” in terms of complexity. The construction of is a generalization of the construction of the “cone” superalgebra (which is called “supersymmetrized Lie superalgebra” in Cordes:1994fc).
We will now briefly outline these constructions, and the results of the present paper.
The cone of Lie superalgebra
In our conventions, “grade” corresponds to the “ghost number”; statistics is not grade mod 2.
The commutator is defined as follows. The commutator of two elements of is the commutator of , the commutator of two elements of is zero, is an ideal, the action of on corresponds to the adjoint representation of . The differential is zero on and maps elements of to the elements of , i.e.: .
String measure
Equivariant string measure
Let be the algebra of vector fields on the worldsheet.
In the BV approach to string worldsheet theory, worldsheet diffeomorphisms are symmetries of ,
and therefore is -invariant. We are interested in constructing the -equivariant version of .
Generally speaking, there is no good algorithm for constructing an equivariant PDF out of an invariant PDF.
But in our case, since satisfies Eq. (3), we can reduce the construction
of equvariant form to the construction of an embedding
—
Vertex operators
Consider deformations of . In string theory context they are called “vertex operators”. It is useful to consider deformations which break some of the symmetries. Typically, we insert some operators at some points on the wordsheet, breaking the diffeomorphisms down to the subgroup preserving that set of points. This is the “unintegrated vertex operator”. Then, there exists an averaging procedure which restores the symmetry group back to all diffeomorphisms. The result of this averaging is effectively an insertion of “integrated vertex operator” which preserves all the diffeomorphisms. This relation between unintegrated and integrated vertex operators is important in string theory.
At this time, we do not have concrete examples of string worldsheet theories where would not enter only through the projection to . It is likely that pure spinor superstring in AdS background is an example, but we only have a partial construction Mikhailov:2017mdo.
Previous work
Previous work on equivariant BV formalism includes Nersessian:1993me, Nersessian:1993eq, Nersessian:1995yt, Getzler:2015jrr, Getzler:2016fek, Cattaneo:2016zrn, Getzler:2018sbh, Bonechi:2019dqk. Similar algebraic structures appeared recently (in a different context?) in Bonezzi:2019bek and references therein.