Integration measures from representations of and
PDFs from representations of
Mapping to cochains
Mapping to PDFs
PDFs from representations of
PDFs from representations of
If acts on a manifold, then acts in PDFs. More generally,
acts in cochains of Chevalley-Eilenberg complexes of .
Question: Given some representation of , can we map it to PDFs, or to cochains?
Mapping to cochains
Proposition 2.
Let
be a
-module, and
an intertwiner of
-modules:
(One may think of
as an “integration operation”.)
Consider the subspace
Then operation
intertwines this subspace
with the Chevalley-Eilenberg complex
:
Proof follows from Eq. (
25).
Therefore every
defines an inhomogeneous Chevalley-Eilenberg cochain of
with coefficients in
:
The map
intertwines the action of
on
with the standard action of
in cochains with
coefficients in
—
the
of
Proposition 1.
(This action does not use
,
generally speaking there is no such thing as
.
Our
, unlike
, is just a
-module, not a differential
-module.)
Mapping to PDFs
Suppose that
happens to be a space of functions on some manifold
with an action of
(the Lie group corresponding to
).
In this case, every
and a point
defines a closed PDF on
, in the following way:
We will be mostly interested in the cases when this PDF descends to the
-orbit of
.
For example, consider the case when is the space of PDFs on (the same )
and is the restriction of a PDF on the zero section .
(Remember that PDFs are functions on . In this example, the operation associates
to every form its 0-form component.) In this case, given a PDF on ,
e.g. , our procedure, for each , associates to it a PDF on ,
which is just .
If acts freely, will descend to a form on the orbit of . This is just the
restriction to the orbit of the original form we started with.
As another example, consider the Lie algebra of vector fields on some manifold ,
and the space of PDFs on . Let be the space of orientable -dimensional
submanifolds of , and the operation of integration over such a submanifold.
Our construction maps closed forms on to closed forms on .
PDFs from representations of
An analogue of Eq. (
25) holds for
. It follows as a particular case from
the results of
Alekseev:2010gr:
where
is:
Suppose that
is a representation of
with a differential
compatible
wiith
, and
a representation of
. Suppose that there
is an “integration operation”
satisfying the analogue of (
26):
Then the following analogue of Eq. (
27) holds: