Family of Lagrangian submanifolds
Here we will describe a family of Lagrangian submanifolds which is a generalization of the construction used in bosonic string theory
1 Conormal bundle
Let
be some family of submanifolds
closed under the action of the gauge symmetry
“closed under the action” means that if
then for any gauge transformation
,
For each
, the odd conormal bundle of
(denoted
) is a subbundle
of the odd cotangent bundle
which consists of those covectors which evaluate to zero
on vectors tangent to
. For each
, the corresponding odd conormal bundle is a
Lagrangian submanifold. Given such a family
, let us define a family of Lagrangian
submanifolds in the BV phase space in the following way: for every
, the corresponding
Lagrangian submanifold is the odd conormal bundle of
, times the space of
-ghosts:
2 Non-degeneracy
Let us ask the following question: under what conditions
the restriction of
to each
is non-degenerate?
Or, in case if it is degenerate, how can we characterize the degeneracy? We have:
The second term
is the evaluation of the covector
on the tangent vector
.
Let us assume that the restriction of
to any
has a critical
point, and study the quadratic terms in the expansion of
around a critical point.
To define the perturbation theory, we need already the quadratic terms to be non-degenerate.
Assuming that the critical point is at
:
Suppose that all degeneracies of
and of
are due to symmetries. In other words:
Let
be the quadratic part of
:
The degeneracy is characterized by the isotropic subspace of
which we denote
:
|
Let us make the following assumptions:
The space
is zero, in other words
is transverse to the orbits of
. This is a constraint on the choice of
The next term,
, is also zero. This kernel being nonzero corresponds to “reducible” gauge symmetries.
But the last term
is essentially nonzero.
It can be identified with the cotangent space to our family:
where
is the moduli space of submanifolds
. Therefore the quadratic part of
is degenerate. However this degeneration is removed by
the factor
Indeed, in this case:
When we integrate over
, the differentials
span the complement of
in
. Since we require that the family
be
-closed,
defines a map
which we denote
. With these notations: